SECRET
DOCUMENT ARISES QUESTIONS ABOUT SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSES’S DEATH
. നേതാജിയെക്കുറിച്ചുള്ള വിവരം പുറത്തുവിടണമെന്ന് ബ്രിട്ടനോട് കുടുംബാംഗങ്ങള്
Contrary
to official version that Bose was killed in an air crash in 1945, a widely held
view has been that he was in the Soviet Russia after that. The report of the
Justice Mukherjee Commission of Inquiry, summarily dismissed by the UPA
government in 2006, had stated that the story of Bose's death was planted by
the Japanese even as the Indian leader prepared to escape to Soviet Russia
where he hoped to get an asylum.After
the fall of the Soviet empire in 1991, Asiatic Society scholars visiting Moscow
came across information that convinced them that records about Bose were
available in the security and intelligence related archives in that country. The
researchers led by Dr Purabi Roy of Kolkata's Jadavpur University later alleged
that the Government was not keen to help them access the archives for the
information concerned.Now
this secret note -- made available to this writer in full by author Anuj Dhar
who has used parts of it in his book No Secrets--
reveals that the ministry was in favour of seeking information from Russia but
could not do so due to "political disinterest".
Significantly,
this is the first time that this classified document is appearing in the public
domain. Even Dhar did not reproduce it in its entirety in his recently
published book No Secrets for reasons best known to him."Pranab
Mukherjee did a wee
little for finding out the truth about Netaji in spite of his protestations
that he is his admirer," alleges Dhar.
The
very first paragraph of the record states that "from time to time various
articles have appeared in the Soviet/Russian press insinuating, though without
any actual proof, that Netaji in fact stayed/was incarcerated in the Soviet
Union".In
other words, the ministry admitted that the theory of Bose's survival after his
death had takers in Russia also, not just in India.
The
note further reads: "Since the matter is of considerable public interest,
we had taken up the matter with the Russian authorities through our Embassy in
Moscow. In January, 1992, we had received a disclaimer from the Russian Foreign
Ministry to the effect that 'according to that data in the Central and
Republican Archives, no information whatsoever is available on the stay of the
former President of the Indian National Congress, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose,
in the former Soviet Union in 1945 and thereafter'."
Dhar
snaps that there were enough reasons for India to raise the issue prior to 1992
when "statesmen and world leaders were at the helm of affairs in New
Delhi".
He
cites the issue of Raoul Wallenberg, a Swedish diplomat who, like Bose,
disappeared in 1945. "Wallenberg is not in the Soviet Union and is unknown
to us" - the Soviets told the Swedes for a decade before admitting that he
had been taken a prisoner by the Red Army.
"India
never used even a jot of its diplomatic clout with the Soviets to find out
whether or not Netaji was with them," Dhar adds.All
the same, Narayan countered the Russian disclaimer in his note. He stated that
the Russians ending up finding without evidence of Bose's stay in the USSR was
not based on the ultra secret and inaccessible KGB archives, which according to
Purabi Roy and others contained records about Bose."Papers
relating to the Stalinist period (KGB archives) are kept separately and have so
far not been accessed by foreign and even Russian scholars, with the exception
perhaps of very limited and selected scholars like the late historian
Volkogonov, who has published biographies of Lenin and Stalin on this
basis," Narayan noted.The
JS observed that the best thing one could do in the circumstance was to
"request the Russian authorities to conduct a search into these archives
and let us know if there is any evidence of Netaji's stay in the Soviet
Union".He
ended the note recommending that the Indian Ambassador in Moscow (which would
have been Ronen Sen) should "make a suitable demarche to the Russian
authorities".
Below
Narayan's note appears the comment of EAM (External Affairs Minister Pranab
Mukherjee) directing FS (Foreign Secretary Salman Haidar) to talk with Narayan
"urgently".
Dhar
claims that subsequent to this talk, no demarche was issued. "Thousands of
documents such as this one have been kept secret on the pretext of national
security or relation with foreign states; whereas the true reason for the
secrecy is to keep the people of India in dark about Netaji's fate," he
says.Will
the Government of India respond?
The
writer is a Firstpost columnist and a strategic analyst who tweets @Kishkindha.നേതാജി സുഭാഷ്ചന്ദ്രബോസിനെക്കുറിച്ചുള്ള വിവരങ്ങളെല്ലാം പുറത്തുവിടണമെന്ന് അദ്ദേഹത്തിന്റെ കുടുംബാംഗങ്ങള് ബ്രിട്ടനോട് ആവശ്യപ്പെട്ടു. ജപ്പാനും അമേരിക്കയും ഇതേ ആവശ്യം പരിഗണിക്കവെയാണ് കുടുംബാംഗങ്ങള് ബ്രിട്ടീഷ് സര്ക്കാരിനെയും സമീപിച്ചത്. നേതാജിയുടെ ബന്ധു സൂര്യകുമാര്ബോസാണ് തന്റെ സഹോദരി ഈ ആവശ്യം ഉന്നയിച്ചതായി വെളിപ്പെടുത്തിയത്. രേഖകള് പരിശോധിക്കാമെന്ന് ബ്രിട്ടന് അറിയിച്ചെന്നും രഹസ്യരേഖകള് അവരുടെ പക്കലുണ്ടെന്ന് ഇതില്നിന്ന് വ്യക്തമാണെന്നും അദ്ദേഹം പറഞ്ഞു. നേതാജി വിമാനാപകടത്തില് മരിച്ചുവെന്നാണ് ഇന്ത്യന് സര്ക്കാരിന്റെ ഔദ്യോഗിക വിശദീകരണം. എന്നാല്, ഇതുസംബന്ധിച്ച വിശദാംശങ്ങളൊന്നും പുറത്തുവിട്ടിട്ടില്ല. അതിനാല്, സംഭവം നടന്ന് ഏഴുപതിറ്റാണ്ട് പിന്നിട്ടിട്ടും നിഗൂഢത തുടരുകയാണ്. ഇത് നീക്കണമെന്ന് നേതാജിയുടെ കുടുംബം കുറച്ചുകാലമായി ആവശ്യപ്പെടുകയാണ്. എന്നാല്, രേഖകള് പരസ്യമാക്കാന് കഴിയില്ലെന്ന് പ്രധാനമന്ത്രിയുടെ ഓഫീസ് അറിയിച്ചു. രേഖകള് പുറത്തുവിടാനുള്ള ധൈര്യം നരേന്ദ്ര മോഡിക്കുണ്ടെന്നാണ് താന് കരുതിയിരുന്നതെന്ന് സൂര്യകുമാര്ബോസ് പറഞ്ഞു.
Prof. John Kurakar
No comments:
Post a Comment