MOBILE
PHONES- DEVELOPING WORLD BOOST E-LEARNING
Globalisation,
as defined by the rich, is a very nice thing, the former US president Jimmy
Carter once reflected. "You're talking about the internet, you're talking
about cell phones, you're talking about computers," said Mr. Carter.
"This doesn't affect two-thirds of the people in the world." That was
in 2001; a lot has changed. In Kenya, mobile phones have become an integral
part of cash transfer schemes, enabling poor people in urban areas to buy food.
In remote rural areas of Peru, computers provided by the Euro-Solar programme
are fuelling an appetite for learning among children.And the senior US
political adviser Alec Ross - acknowledging the galvanising influence of social
media on the Arab spring - has described the internet as "the Che Guevara
of the 21st century".If the global spread of technology can do all this,
what else might it achieve? Quite a lot, according to the authors of a report
prepared by the GSMA mobile industry body and published to coincide with last
week's eLearning Africa conference in Cotonou, Benin. Shaping the future -
realising the potential of informal learning through mobile, explores mobile
technology's potential to improve access to education for young people in
developing countries. The study looks at Ghana, Morocco, Uganda and Maharashtra
in India, identifying young people's aspirations and priorities, exploring the
education and employment challenges they face, and scrutinising their mobile
phone use.
The endgame is
to establish how the mobile industry and international development community
can pool their expertise to create m-learning services that improve teaching
and learning, and therefore promote long-term development."It's a big step
in the right direction in terms of putting the possibilities in front of the
GSMA's members and raising awareness of the commercial and business
opportunities education represents in the developing world," says John
Traxler, professor of m-learning at the University of Wolverhampton in the UK.
"Clearly it's a small sample, covering only four countries, so it's
indicative rather than representative. But if the networks get the message,
it's a valuable piece of work. Networks don't need to hear it's virtuous, they
need to hear it's profitable - just enough to encourage them to get out there
and do something."Mobile phones are increasingly ubiquitous in poor
countries, which now account for four in every five connections worldwide . As
Elsie Kanza, of the World Economic Forum, recently said: "Regardless of
social class, almost everyone [in Africa] has a mobile phone, or two or three.
Even in remote villages, mobile phones have replaced the bicycle or radio as
prized assets."An obvious caveat is that voice-calls far outstrip data use
in poor countries, which remain an emerging market for smartphones and other
data-enabled devices. One reason is cost. A quarter of the young people
surveyed - and almost half of those from Ghana - said a shortage of money was
the biggest obstacle to accessing educational resources. Even so, the rapid
spread of mobile technology offers clear possibilities for learning.
Of the young
people participating in the study who had accessed the internet, half had done
so on a mobile device.One female student from rural India told the GSMA
researchers: "In class, I sometimes record the lectures on my phone so I
can listen to them later in case I forget or don't understand. I can use the
calculator to help me with my maths. My favourite subjects are maths, science,
history and economics. If you could get these on your mobile it would be good. Enthusiasm
for learning was a common thread in the feedback. Only family and health were felt
to be of greater importance by the study's participants, 30% of whom said
having a good career ranked higher among their priorities than marriage or home
ownership.Despite this aspirational outlook, however, only a quarter said the
classroom was their principal source of information and education. Friends and
family were identified as more important by 41%, while 43% gleaned most of
their knowledge from TV programmes. So can m-learning help? Yes, say the
report's authors, who suggest that, by using the study's findings to tap into
common interests among young mobile users, the reach and impact of educational
material can be increased. Many of those surveyed used their devices to access
music and sports content (49% and 24% respectively across the four areas
studied); by bundling learning material with, say, football updates, the GSMA
researchers believe technology can make a significant difference.
Others,
however, are sceptical. Some experts say there is little demonstrable evidence
of m-learning's impact, suggesting it threatens to undermine traditional
teaching methods and - by leaving those without access to devices at a
disadvantage - reinforce inequality.Prof. Traxler believes such arguments are
misguided. "You don't have to pay for mobile technology, and it reaches
the people you want to reach," he argues. "Computers, books,
television sets and college buildings may be infinitely more respected, but
people already have mobile phones - they buy them, pay for them, and carry
them. So let's look at how the technology is representative of our society, and
how we can use it, rather than worrying about the niceties of education."The
report preaches a message Prof. Traxler has long championed, one he hopes will
now trickle down not only to mobile networks and their commercial departments,
but also to governments. "That's where the action needs to happen,"
he says. "We've had 10 years of relatively small-scale, short-term
projects, and by their very nature I'm not sure how much they would really have
told us, or how rigorous they were."The case that needs to be made is
about sustainability, scale, return on investment and impacting on government
policies. If the GSMA can do a better job than the rest of us have done in the
past 10 years, then good luck to them - and I think they probably will."
Prof. John Kurakar
No comments:
Post a Comment